University of Liverpool Logo
The Human Remains Digital Library

Searching the Library

Sorting the documents

General searches

The search page displays 24 random examples from the library as a default. This is to encourage users to explore the library’s contents that they may not have expected. However, there are several functions on this page to facilitate different approaches to searching the library in order to find extracts, narrow results, or find related extracts. You may:

Keyword search – this is a text box where you can type in any keywords you want to search for within the library.

Looking for specific people

Order by – you can use this drop-down menu on the main search page to sort the results by:

Filtering search results

Document Information

Account Type – This filter lists the different types of sources and genres the extracts have been taken from which are available in the library. Most of these are self-explanatory but the following are explained:

'Any category appended with '- undisturbed' signifies a reported instance in which human remains have been identified, found, or otherwise located but not interacted with in the course of activity undertaken by the account.

Coverage Era - General ‘eras’ can be selected for those wanting to focus on key periods of distinction.

The date ranges from the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) were applied to divide ‘medieval’ (AD410-1539) from ‘postmedieval’ (AD1500–1900) and from 'modern' (AD1901-onwards) so both textual and archaeological evidence could be categorised temporally in the same way for HRDL. As the Reformation process began in the early decades of the 16th century, (hence the 1500–1539 overlap in the PAS schema), texts written or published in 1500–1539 were collated under ‘Postmedieval’ unless they clearly related to the topics in the medieval sub-corpora, which meant the thematic groupings often transcended a strict medieval/postmedieval divide. You can use the ‘century of publication’ filter to narrow a search within a period.

Evidence Type - At launch there are two values for this field, allowing users to separate content taken from descriptive text accounts and those derived from archaeological reports:

Narrative Type - Three options are listed. These are not based on word count but categorised in relative terms compared to similar types of account (genre, media) and/or subject. Narrative type applies to the extract in the library not the whole document it was taken from.

Document Details

Subject - This lists the most common types of people that have been exhumed archaeologically, especially saints, royals, nobility, clergy, criminals, military people, laity (secular individuals who don’t belong to the other categories), and charnel (large collections of human bones kept on church ground). Where a type of person is not the subject of the extract, the main topic is listed instead e.g. ‘theology’ or ‘supernatural’ events.

Site Name - This lists all the sites mentioned in the extracts in alphabetical order.

Original Language - This lists the language(s) in which the extract or document was originally written. These versions are not included in the main library and cannot be accessed using the library’s search options - however, collections sorted by their original languages will be made available to download separately in a future update. Modern translations have either been sourced or translated by the project team.

Century of Publication - This filters the century of publication for the printed source from which the extracts were taken (not necessarily the century it was written).

Publication Year - This filters the year or date-range for when the extracts were initially produced or published for more specific searching and can be used to narrow-down results if a ‘century of publication’ has been selected first.

Extract Creator - This lists the people who have created collections of extracts and can be used to filter search results.

Gender of Deceased - This refers to the gender of the human remains as reported in the original extract. ‘Gender’ has been used rather than ‘sex’ as the ability to identify biological sex from human remains accurately is a largely mid-20th century development. The majority of the authors and investigators in the library’s corpus were using cultural ideas, local histories, and gender stereotypes familiar to them to interpret human remains. We have not attempted to identify whether the authors and investigators were accurate or inaccurate, and many of these bodies have long-since been lost, reburied, or destroyed and therefore cannot be re-examined with modern methods.

Related Records - Where multiple extracts have come from the same source (e.g. the same book or catalogue), these extracts can be grouped together using this filter. The format of the entries in this filter is: ‘Surname_Year_ShortTitleofSource’ with ‘Surname’ being the surname of the source’s author or editor, or name of the source database; ‘Year’ being the year of extract’s publication (not necessarily the year it was written); and a shortened version of the title of the source material.